Search for: "State v. Buffington"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm
Jaeger VA Regional Office: Cleveland, Ohio Veteran’s Representative at BVA: The American Legion Date of BVA Decision: July 20, 2017 Date of CAVC Decision: July 12, 2019 The post PRECEDENTIAL CAVC CASE ALERT: Buffington v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm
And Judge Greenberg encapsulated well the obvious concern the majority side-stepped in his dissenting opinion: “Section 3.654(b) does not merely “create a mechanism by which VA manages compensation benefits when veterans return to active duty,” as the majority states, it also creates an unnecessary and inappropriate impediment to a veteran receiving benefits he has already established entitlement to. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm
And Judge Greenberg encapsulated well the obvious concern the majority side-stepped in his dissenting opinion: “Section 3.654(b) does not merely “create a mechanism by which VA manages compensation benefits when veterans return to active duty,” as the majority states, it also creates an unnecessary and inappropriate impediment to a veteran receiving benefits he has already established entitlement to. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 7:25 am
State v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 9:01 am
“Once it has opened a limited forum … the State must respect the lawful boundaries it has itself set. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 7:47 pm
[Fults v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:17 am
The case, Pena-Rodriquez v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 1:42 pm
" State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 4:40 am
Buffington v. [read post]
