Search for: "State v. Buffington"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2010, 8:00 pm
Chang v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:00 am
Yesterday, July 13, 2011, the Hawaii Supreme Court issued a well-organized opinion authored by Chief Justice Recktenwald in Chang v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm
Jaeger VA Regional Office: Cleveland, Ohio Veteran’s Representative at BVA: The American Legion Date of BVA Decision: July 20, 2017 Date of CAVC Decision: July 12, 2019 The post PRECEDENTIAL CAVC CASE ALERT: Buffington v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm
And Judge Greenberg encapsulated well the obvious concern the majority side-stepped in his dissenting opinion: “Section 3.654(b) does not merely “create a mechanism by which VA manages compensation benefits when veterans return to active duty,” as the majority states, it also creates an unnecessary and inappropriate impediment to a veteran receiving benefits he has already established entitlement to. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm
And Judge Greenberg encapsulated well the obvious concern the majority side-stepped in his dissenting opinion: “Section 3.654(b) does not merely “create a mechanism by which VA manages compensation benefits when veterans return to active duty,” as the majority states, it also creates an unnecessary and inappropriate impediment to a veteran receiving benefits he has already established entitlement to. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
More specifically, in his opinion last Term dissenting from a denial of cert in Buffington v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 9:01 am
“Once it has opened a limited forum … the State must respect the lawful boundaries it has itself set. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 7:47 pm
[Fults v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:09 pm
In Buffington v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:17 am
The case, Pena-Rodriquez v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 8:12 am
Rather than the court indicating that this cause of action is governed by strict liability and that that under strict liability time is not a factor, and that it does not matter how many times, or for what period of time that the activity lasted, the court cited to an abstract principle regarding the definition of keeper or controller referenced in the case of Buffington v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 12:47 pm
Buffington v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 1:10 pm
First up is Buffington v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 7:59 am
(rescheduled before the June 16 conference; relisted after the June 23, June 29, Sept. 28, Oct. 7 and Oct. 14 conferences) Buffington v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:02 pm
Judge Ginoza issued 1 concurring opinion from an SDO in a criminal case State v. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
All the other cases were decided under Step One or under an exception, such as United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 1:42 pm
" State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
One could not confidently say the same of the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 12:11 pm
Most noteworthy here: In Buffington v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 4:40 am
" Buffington v. [read post]
