Search for: "State v. Burling" Results 61 - 80 of 157
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm by Mark Murakami
Matteoni, Matteoni O’Laughlin & Hechtman, San Jose, California, Edward V. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– McLean, VA lawyer Mark Dombroff of McKenna Long & Aldridge on the firm’s blog, Plane-ly Spoken Supreme Court rules induced infringement requires a 271(a) direct infringer (Limelight v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 9:36 am by Guest Author
., partner at Covington & Burling LLP in Washington, D.C., and chairman of The Media Institute’s First Amendment Advisory Council. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 8:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
DaimlerChrysler I recorded the latest episode of the Lawfare podcast: an interview with Covington & Burling partner Mark Plotkin. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm by John Steele
In a high profile disqualification dispute, Covington & Burling was disqualified in the case of State of Minnesota v. 3M. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 5:41 am
" And some direct commentary from the players involved: "3M v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:37 am
  The United States Supreme Court ruled that Justice Benjamin ought to have recused himself in the case Caperton v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:47 am by Gina Durham
Reproduced with permission from Electronic Commerce & Law Report, (June 13, 2012). [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  John Graubert, Covington & Burling, formerly deputy counsel: defense perspective. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
., of the Washington office of Covington & Burling, will argue first, with 40 minutes of time. [read post]