Search for: "State v. Butts" Results 1 - 20 of 655
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am by Deanne Sowter
After the second incident, the father sent text messages to a third party and admitted that “he had “snapped”, “grabbed [the mother’s] head”, and “ended up giving her a head butt”, which he said he knew was wrong (at para 13). [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:33 am by SHG
In Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
Because Maine officers cannot get a warrant to take someone into protective custody without a crime being committed, Skolfield could not force the face-to-face interaction he needed to temporarily confiscate Card’s weapons under the state’s yellow flag law. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 10:14 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Butts & Johnson (WCAB—ADJ14033416) Injury AOE/COE—Special Risk Exception to Non-Compensability of Non-Occupational Diseases—COVID-19—WCAB, denying reconsideration… Duran (Cecilia) v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm by Michael Lowe
Since September 2021, anyone arrested for violation of  Texas Penal Code §43.021 is facing charges of a either state jail felony or felonies of either the 2nd or 3rd degree, as compared to misdemeanor charges in other states. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Butts & Johnson, Sentinel Insurance Company administered by The Hartford, Defendants, 2023 Cal. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:42 am by SHG
If you want to really shred precedent, why not start with Marbury v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 12:30 am by Frank Cranmer
Betül Durmuş, Strasbourg Observers: Cupiał v Poland: what could this case offer on religious upbringing? [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
As stated above, a non exhaustive definition does not necessarily oust other definitions. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
If you just blithely ignore it, and publish the story despite having been told that it may well be mistaken, that would be textbook "reckless disregard," which would allow liability even in a public official case: Consider, for instance, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. [read post]