Search for: "State v. Butts"
Results 81 - 100
of 655
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2013, 11:45 am
I could certainly see such a holding come out of a differently-constituted Court, or from a state supreme court not compelled to interpret its state constitutional provisions identically to those contained in the federal Constitution.Which is not to say that Justice Bedsworth necessarily gets this one wrong. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
United States) prohibits such blanket interception. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 1:48 pm
Your knees hurt, your back hurts, your butt hurts, whatever. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:11 pm
In its 2011 decision in Harrington v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 4:05 pm
This case is Brownmark Films, LLC v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 7:59 am
Here are the materials in City of New York v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 7:36 am
Butt v Norway [2012] ECHR 1905 confirmed the earlier approach and in Jeunesse v Netherlands (2015) 60 EHRR 17 the Grand Chamber authoritatively dealt with the issue further by holding that “settled migrants” were special because the subsequent withdrawal of settlement rights (owing to criminal activities) will constitute an interference with the respect for private and/or family life. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:04 am
In a similar vein, we are thankful for the helpful briefing and argument we received from the United States as amicus curiae. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 7:47 am
Co. v Butts, 269 AD2d 558, 559-560; U.S. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Butts v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:43 pm
Justice Gorsuch with opinion in Texas v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 12:24 pm
McClendon v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 3:41 pm
S Butt v London Borough of Hackney. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 4:39 am
The Gallego court analogized the DNA testing of the discarded cigarette butt to the lifting of fingerprints from discarded juice containers in People v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 6:49 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 12:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 3:54 pm
However, in the case of Batson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 4:22 am
State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 9:24 am
In addition to the foregoing recommendations, which applied to all four CCAs, the CPUC also had additional recommendations directed specifically to Butte Choice Energy and the City of Santa Barbara CCA. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 7:09 am
Christiansen v. [read post]
