Search for: "State v. C. A. J."
Results 1 - 20
of 6,448
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2010, 8:29 am
I have been working my way through the mammoth (484 paragraphs plus chronology) judgment of Mr Justice Charles in J v J [2009] EWHC 2654 (Fam). [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 10:29 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of the Program. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:21 am
Section 553 (c)(2)(C). [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 8:03 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of Star Power: Floyd Mayweather, Jr. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 10:11 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of the Manny Pacquiao v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:08 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of Star Power: Floyd Mayweather, Jr. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:30 pm
The lawyers for C & J (and Macy's) decide that Scott Shaw -- a young partner (and 2002 graduate of USC Law) will argue the case. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 9:28 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of the Program. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
Holloway v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
This post concludes and summarizes our coverage of the case United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 3:35 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am
On 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72, relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 12:14 pm
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of the Programs. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 9:47 am
GINSBURG, J. [read post]
16 May 2012, 1:01 pm
J. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 8:51 am
United States, holding that section 924(c)'s requirement of consecutive sentences does not apply when conviction is under section 924(j). [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 6:39 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:15 am
The recent Court of Appeal decision in C v W [2008] EWCA Civ 1459 was concerned with a CFA with a success fee that was entered into after liability had been admitted by the Defendant's insurers. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:31 pm
In Lora v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 7:15 am
P. 12(c)), based upon the recent decision in Interscope v. [read post]
