Search for: "State v. C. E. K." Results 1 - 20 of 1,161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2008, 5:34 pm
The Western Climate Initiative, including California and several  Western States, have proposed a greenhouse gas emission reporting rule that would cover the following industries:   (A) Adipic acid manufacturing (B) Aluminum production (C) Ammonia manufacturing (D) Cement production (E) Coal mine fugitive emissions (active and abandoned) (F) Cogeneration (G) Electricity generation (H) Electronics Manufacturing (I) Ferroalloy production (J) Glass… [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 9:32 am by John J Downes
The risk arose out of what C had chosen to do not as a result of the state of the premises and therefore there was no breach of duty. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:06 pm
  The compensation amount under Section 1.61 21(f)(5)(iii) remains unchanged at $215,000.The Code provides that the $1,000,000,000 threshold used to determine whether a multiemployer plan is a systematically important plan under section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(aa) is adjusted using the cost-of-living adjustment provided under Section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(bb). [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
Namely, (a) the aroused emotional state the dog is in during an attack; (b) the strong desire to find a person to attack; (c) the bite and hold training the dog has received; (d) poor selection of the dog at the time of purchase, and (e) an inexperienced or poorly supervised dog/handler team. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
Namely, (a) the aroused emotional state the dog is in during an attack; (b) the strong desire to find a person to attack; (c) the bite and hold training the dog has received; (d) poor selection of the dog at the time of purchase, and (e) an inexperienced or poorly supervised dog/handler team. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
Namely, (a) the aroused emotional state the dog is in during an attack; (b) the strong desire to find a person to attack; (c) the bite and hold training the dog has received; (d) poor selection of the dog at the time of purchase, and (e) an inexperienced or poorly supervised dog/handler team. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
  Rather, “[c]ourts must decide the applicability of comment k case-by-case, and only after taking evidence related to the various factors. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:39 am by Simon Chester
Canada (Premier ministre) c. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 1:38 pm
  The dollar limitation under Section 414(v)(2)(B)(ii) for catch-up contributions to an applicable employer plan described in Section 401(k)(11) or Section 408(p) for individuals aged 50 or over is increased from $2,500 to $3,000.The annual compensation limitation under Section 401(a)(17) for eligible participants in certain governmental plans that, under the plan as in effect on July 1, 1993, allowed cost of living adjustments to the compensation limitation under the… [read post]