Search for: "State v. C. Russell" Results 61 - 80 of 619
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2023, 12:29 am by Frank Cranmer
The decision in R (on the application of Fox) v Secretary of State for Education [2015] EWHC 3404 (Admin) concerned the new subject content issued for GCSE Religious Studies. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:05 am by Rachel Sachs
Jackson filed her brief  in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:14 am by Laura Sandwell
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Jianlin Chen, Deconstructing the Religious Free Market, (3 Journal of Law, Religion and State 1-24 (2014)).Russell G. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am by Amy Howe
Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:49 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Disclosures: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, served as co-counsel to the petitioners in City of Arlington v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am by Carolina Attorneys
Russell, you have not observed anything of [Defendant] that would indicate [Defendant] lacked STATE V. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 4:52 pm by Patricia Salkin
VI of the United States Constitution, the Supremacy Clause, because federal regulation of marijuana as a controlled substance preempts state authority to enact c. 94G. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:39 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix
Russell and others v Transocean International Resources Limited (Scotland), heard 26 – 28 October 2011. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am by Laura Sandwell
Russell and others v Transocean International Resources Limited (Scotland), heard 26 – 28 October 2011. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:45 pm by Dan Bushell
2011 will surely go down as the Year of the Class Action in the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 6:06 am by James Bickford
”   Elsewhere in the Post, Barnes also has coverage of the government’s recent cert. petition in United States v. [read post]