Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 1 - 20 of 15,239
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2009, 8:49 am by Clare Freeman, RWS, WD Mich
This is going to be brief b/c it's been quite a week here, but interesting things have been brewing.Supreme Court:* 924(c)---United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 5:15 am by Peter Reap
The determinations of the Board were all supported by substantial evidence (B/E Aerospace, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 6:23 am
Among the nine majority opinions (which is more than I've seen in a while - and right before Christmas, too) is State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:34 am by Anna Christensen
§ 3582(c)(2) as “sentencings at which [United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
This year the Supreme Court Historical Society’s Frank C. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 6:45 am by FM Librarian
Chase Blog, July 2018) [text]Practice Alert: AG Sessions Issues Matter of A-B-, Overruling Matter of A-R-C-G- (AILA, July 2018) [access]- Provides tips and resources for legal practitioners.A Review of the Attorney General’s Review(s) (RefLaw Blog, July 2018) [text]"Trump Administration to Turn Away Far More Asylum Seekers at the Border under New Guidance," CNN, 11 July 2018 [text]USCIS is Redefining Who Qualifies for Asylum in This New Guidance… [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am by Alyson Poole (AU)
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am by Alyson Poole (AU)
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:15 am
The recent Court of Appeal decision in C v W [2008] EWCA Civ 1459 was concerned with a CFA with a success fee that was entered into after liability had been admitted by the Defendant's insurers. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:46 am by Gene Quinn
The Supreme Court reversed the Federal Circuit and ruled that 28 U.S.C. 1400(b) remains the only applicable patent venue statute, that 28 U.S.C. 1391(c) did not modify or amend 1400(b) or the Court's 1957 ruling in Fourco Glass Co. v. [read post]