Search for: "State v. C. V."
Results 61 - 80
of 39,538
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
This post concludes and summarizes our coverage of the case United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:50 am
United States, 559 F.3d 1228 (Fed. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 8:53 am
United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 2:08 am
Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Lucheng Meijing Industrial Co Ltd and others; Nokia Corpn v Revenue and Customs Comrs (Internationak Trademark Association intervening) (Joined Cases C-446/09 and C-495/09); [2011] WLR (D) 349 “Goods coming from a non-EU state which were imitations of goods protected in the European Union by a trade mark or copies of goods protected in the EU by copyright could not be classified as “counterfeit… [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 5:58 am
No. 03 C 9370. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 4:32 am
That was the difficult question the Supreme Court had to grapple with in the case of R(C) v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 1:37 pm
United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 8:50 am
On June 13, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 8:50 am
On June 13, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
Facts of United States v Aguilar United States District Judge Robert Aguilar was convicted of one count of illegally disclosing a wiretap in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 7:27 pm
Section 1512(c) in... [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 6:49 am
The post Case Comment: EM v Secretary of State for the Home Department appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm
This year the Supreme Court Historical Society’s Frank C. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 10:16 am
SCOTUSblog deserves considerable thanks for putting together this symposium about United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 8:29 pm
Lund (Wayne State) has posted Salazar v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:07 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Elmi: [2011] EWCA Civ 1403; [2011] WLR (D) 353 “A person from abroad who had ticked a form at a job centre to confirm she was seeking work and then applied for income support satisfied the requirement in article 7(3)(c) of the Citizens Direction that she was registered as a job seeker and was entitled to income support.” WLR Daily, 18th October 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
Holloway v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 8:49 pm
The post State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 1:25 pm
., C. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 1:39 pm
See Massachusetts v. [read post]
