Search for: "State v. Callahan"
Results 61 - 80
of 467
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2020, 10:02 am
In yet another development in the closely watched case of Rizo v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 10:02 am
In yet another development in the closely watched case of Rizo v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 11:10 am
1) Allen v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:19 am
In Wingate v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 11:42 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument in FTC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 10:51 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:01 am
Similarly, in R.E. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 9:41 am
Cook v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 12:32 pm
But a decade or so later, he got his sentenced reduced to LWOP on state habeas review because he was intellectually disabled and, under then-recent Supreme Court precedent, we don't execute people like that.So then he files his federal habeas petition, which continues in federal court the challenges to his conviction that he had filed in state court and that the state court rejected. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 9:37 pm
A decision from the First District Court of Appeal today in Hart v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (1980); and a third based on United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 11:04 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Civil Rights Law section 65 was amended to provide that any person may elect to resume the use of a former middle name upon divorce or annulment and that the state shall not impose a fee to change the middle name on a state identifying document due to a change in marital status. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 9:16 am
Feds attack California’s efforts to criminalize meth.United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
The Basic Lesson of Feinberg v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:03 am
In view of the now well-known United States Supreme Court South Dakota v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 10:51 am
., LLC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:15 am
Many well-known legal cases, such as Gruen v. [read post]
10 Aug 2019, 8:03 am
Washington v. [read post]
