Search for: "State v. Carbone" Results 1 - 20 of 1,080
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2020, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Design of Sweden’s Carbon Tax Since its implementation in 1991, Sweden’s carbon tax has been modified multiple times. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 2:44 am
The patented method uses partially carbonized fibers that are then processed into sheets for use on military aircraft.Lockheed Martin was accused of using Zoltek's patented process to produce carbon-fiber sheets and imported these materials into the United States for use in making the F-22Fighter Plane pursuant to a contract with the federal government to design and build F-22 stealth fighters.Zoltek sued Lockheed and the US government in the CFC under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:41 am by Family Law
Professors Naomi Cahn & June Carbone, on the GWU Law Review blog: At the core of the Court’s decision in Young v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Both the state and local tax deduction (SALT) and the home mortgage interest deduction were capped. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 6:23 am by Shari Shapiro
  However, the recent Supreme Court decision in Utility Regulatory Group v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:13 am by James R. Copland
Dukes and that the EPA's governance of carbon-dioxide regulation under the Clean Air Act displaced the federal common law public nuisance suit brought by various states and municipalities in AEP v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 12:14 pm by Taryn Rucinski
Other states argue that not treating it the same will aggravate climate change over time. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 6:09 am by Shari Shapiro
 The EPA and its federal partners intend to discuss the development of appropriate EM&V protocols for such measures with states in the coming years. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 1:28 pm by J. Wylie Donald
  Indeed, one state supreme court has found that exhaled carbon dioxide was not a pollutant, and thus was not excluded by a comprehensive general liability policy’s absolute pollution exclusion. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 1:28 pm by J. Wylie Donald
  Indeed, one state supreme court has found that exhaled carbon dioxide was not a pollutant, and thus was not excluded by a comprehensive general liability policy’s absolute pollution exclusion. [read post]