Search for: "State v. Caring"
Results 1 - 20
of 33,315
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2023, 2:00 am
Graham (University of Manchester), R (Gardner and Harris) V Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and Others [2022] Ewhc 967: Scant Regard for Covid-19 Risk to Care Homes, 30 Medical L.... [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 2:05 pm
Davis”), appellant, appeals a judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County which affirmed the decision of an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) in a case in which the Maryland State Department of Education Office of Child Care (the “Office of Child Care”), appellee, denied Ms. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 9:28 am
Supreme Court ruling in Olmstead v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 5:06 am
The post Supreme Court to take up state law copyright and health care cases appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 8:36 am
Joyce v Secretary of State for Health [2008] EWHC 1891(Admin); [2008] WLR (D) 290 “Where a care worker challenged a finding of misconduct which had resulted in her being placed by the Secretary of State on a list of those considered unsuitable to work with vulnerable adults, the Care Standards Tribunal was entitled on appeal to consider allegations of misconduct not entertained by the Secretary of State at the initial decision-making… [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 5:08 pm
In Gospel Light Mennonite Church Medical Aid Plan v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 5:48 am
On Friday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Coventry Health Care of Missouri, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:35 pm
In Tennessee Department of Human Services v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 1:02 pm
US District Court Judge Rosemary Marquez affirmed the final consent decree in the case Toomey v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:12 am
Joyce v Secretary of State for Health Queen’s Bench Division “Where a care worker challenged a finding of misconduct which had resulted in her being placed by the Secretary of State for Health on a list of those considered unsuitable to work with vulnerable adults, the Care Standards Tribunal was entitled, on appeal, to consider allegations of misconduct not entertained by the secretary of state, provided it acted fairly. [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 12:07 pm
[Toeller v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:01 am
R (Rowley and others) v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 11:27 am
”) State of Ohio v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 3:40 pm
On February 21, 2012, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 3:24 am
MH (Syria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; DS (Afghanistan) v Same [2009] EWCA Civ 226; [2009] WLR (D) 109 “A careful approach was to be applied when one was considering an asylum application and the question whether an asylum-seeker was excluded from the provisions of the Refugee Convention by reason of art 1F(c) [...] [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 2:17 am
R (Wright and others) v Secretary of State for Health and another [2009] UKHL 3; [2009] WLR (D) 20 “The procedure under s 82(4)(b) of the Care Standards Act 2000 allowing the provisional listing of care workers as being unsuited to work with vulnerable adults after a complaint had been made about them, without giving them [...] [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:23 am
Rabone and another v Pennine Care NHS Trust [2010] EWCA Civ 698; [2010] WLR (D) 152 “Health trusts did not have an obligation to take special preventive measures to protect voluntary mental patients from the risk of suicide, even where that risk was ‘real and immediate’. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 10:53 am
The Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) is in the forefront of newspaper coverage these days, with the United States Supreme Court set to decide in King v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
” With this filing in Virginia v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 1:59 am
No duty of care owed over child support R (Rowley and others) v. [read post]
