Search for: "State v. Carolina Power and Light Company" Results 1 - 20 of 137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am by John Mikhail
Perhaps the most notable of these efforts were made in connection with the Bank of North America, along with the Indiana Company, Illinois-Wabash Company, and other early American land companies, whose legal strategies Wilson had a major hand in directing. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 10:14 am by Venkat
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani, with comments from Eric] WEC Carolina Energy Solutions LLC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am by Amy Howe
United Parcel Service, in which a Virginia woman alleges that the shipping company violated the Pregnancy Discrimination Act when it failed to give her “light duty” during her pregnancy. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
On Monday, we saw the contours of state-action immunity from federal antitrust law, and on Tuesday, we saw the basic facts of the North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 5:37 pm
V) MALVEAUX: Congressman Clyburn earlier said today, "I think he can afford to tone it down. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:50 am by John Mikhail
  His impressive database included colonial charters, acts of incorporation for the first and second Banks of the United States, and corporate charters issued by two states, Connecticut and North Carolina, dating from the colonial period through 1819, the year McCulloch v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 4:37 am by Kevin LaCroix
In numerous posts (most recently here), I have noted the ongoing controversy in Delaware on this issue whether or not companies organized under the laws of that state should be able to adopt so-called fee-shifting bylaws. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
Public Company Accounting Oversight Bd., 561 U.S. 477, 505 (2010)). [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  Such laws have withstood judicial challenge in large part because Congress has granted states the authority to impose such restrictions—to effectively legislate their own foreign policy in this narrow lane.[4]  However, as of yet, Congress has not authorized the same powers to states regarding dealings with China or some of the other foreign states that these bills frequently address, such as Russia, Venezuela, and others. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Catherine Morris
The recent findings of an international trial monitoring panel in the case of United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
AG Daimler, and, from our perspective, its impact has been significant, even earth shaking (no pun intended, and we have a San Francisco office and certainly would not make light of earthquakes). [read post]