Search for: "State v. Carrigan" Results 21 - 40 of 74
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2011, 12:43 pm by Lisa McElroy
Finally, the Court also issued its opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 5:58 pm
Carrigan between, on the one hand, Justice Alito, and, on the other hand, the rest of the Court, speaking through Justice Scalia. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:56 am by Nabiha Syed
United States, and Smith v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:01 am by John Steele
Carrigan, the US Supreme Court upheld a Nevada conflict of interest law for state legislators, rebuffing a First Amendment challenge. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 5:34 pm
Carrigan disguises a very interesting disagreement lurking beneath the surface. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:48 pm by Zach Zagger
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website, JURIST news archive] Monday ruled [opinion, PDF] in Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 11:54 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
United States Supreme Court CIVIL OPINIONS Constitutional Law Free speech; ethics laws A state law requiring public officials to recuse themselves from voting on, or advocating the passage or failure of certain measures is not unconstitutionally overbroad. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 10:07 am by Kali Borkoski
The first opinion of the day came in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:47 am by constitutional lawblogger
Carrigan that a legislative vote is not protected speech under the First Amendment and that a state recusal statute therefore did not violate the Constitution. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 7:26 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Carrigan, reversing the Nevada Supreme Court. [read post]