Search for: "State v. Champagne" Results 1 - 20 of 131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2013, 8:00 am by Tim Sitzmann
The issues are similar to those in Ritz Hotel Ltd v. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 6:12 am
ChampagneThe CJEU judgmentThe CJEU substantially followed the AG Opinion, stating that if it tastes like champagne – it is champagne. 1. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by mtlawlibrary
State DA 19-0226 2020 MT 163 Civil – Postconviction Champagne v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 2:28 am
Champagne corks may have been popping in Chancery Lane last night, but the success of the Law Society in its challenge to the Legal Services Commission’s family tender process is no more than a small victory in a war that cannot be won.As the UK Human Rights Blog states, the decision "may only serve to delay the inevitable ... with the system of legal aid under enormous budgetary pressure". [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:50 am
This is not a bankruptcy case, but it will be applicable in many large bankruptcy cases involving allegations of fraud by shareholders or investors.On January 15, 2008, the United States Supreme Court entered an important decision in Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:00 am by Rob Howse
 There was a negotiated cap on liability in an agreement between the investors and  the Venezuela state entity in question. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:23 pm by Pamela Wolf
In a greatly anticipated and deeply divided opinion, the High Court ruled that lawfully married same-sex couples are entitled to the equal protection of the laws pursuant to the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, and thus, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) must fall (United States v Windsor, June 26, 2013, Kennedy, A). [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:23 pm by Pamela Wolf
In a greatly anticipated and deeply divided opinion, the High Court ruled that lawfully married same-sex couples are entitled to the equal protection of the laws pursuant to the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, and thus, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) must fall (United States v Windsor, June 26, 2013, Kennedy, A). [read post]