Search for: "State v. Champagne"
Results 1 - 20
of 181
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2024, 12:16 am
A cautionary example of such a situation is the recent General Court judgment in Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO - MHCS (Nuance de la couleur orange) (T-652/22) concerning the orange colour trade mark for the Veuve Clicquot champagne. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 10:39 am
State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 3:41 am
MHCS v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 11:22 am
Funny ones really. 00:35:19 gretchen desutter: A favorite scene with Monica was a Twins v Yankees game. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
I commend and congratulate the Editor, Alexandra Champagne, for delivering this 10th edition of the McGill Guide. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court decided AMG Capital Management v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
However, national courts of other EU Member States have recently found evocation between PDO “Champagne” and wedding services, or between PDO “Champagne” and restauration services. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
SE v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:29 pm
</span> </p> <p> <span style="display: initial;"> <br/> </span> </p> <h2> <span style="font-weight: bold; display: initial;"> Patent Law </span> </h2> <p> <span style="display: initial;"> <br/> </span> </p> <p> <span style="display: initial;"> … [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:40 am
Victoria’s Secret v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 1:11 am
In the final chapter, May looks into the benefits of PDOs for different groups of stakeholders: producers, consumers, regional and state authorities. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
From that it follows that it is impermissible to base state policies on claimsabout the divine will. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 11:02 am
Ariel Katz in the first case (CBC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 7:43 am
Facebook v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 1:59 pm
The Article never stated Lindell consumes alcohol himself. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 6:00 am
’” Devine states that the impact of the Bush v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:00 am
At oral argument in TransUnion, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 9:34 am
Maître Audet, the Board’s General Counsel, noted some possible questions arising from the pending SCC York University v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
The end result of that litigation was that both parties agreed there was a contract between them and that it was governed by the law of the state of Pennsylvania (where it had been litigated). [read post]
31 May 2021, 1:36 pm
See page 14-15 and FN47 – which at least acknowledges the currently pending Access Copyright v. [read post]
