Search for: "State v. Charles Hudson" Results 1 - 20 of 64
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2013, 5:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As reflected here, notwithstanding concurrent state court jurisdiction in the ’33 Act, the Luther v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 11:45 am by Mark S. Humphreys
James confronted Mattix and another youth, Charles Wooddell. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 6:36 pm
New York case law is consistent that in absence of privity, a cause of action may not be maintained for breach of contract (Plaisir v Royal Home Sales, 81 AD3d 799 [2d Dept 2011]; CDJ Builders Corp v Hudson Group Construction, 67 AD3d 720 [2009]; Grinnell v Ultimate Realty, LLC, 38 AD3d 600 [2007]; M. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:18 pm
In particular, he contends that our statement to the contrary in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 5:20 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Under the Central Hudson test, the state can regulate commercial speech to prevent misleading promotions. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am by Charles Fried
©Charles Fried, 2012 Chief Justice Roberts, in his confirmation hearing, famously analogized the role of the judge to an umpire, calling balls and strikes. [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:25 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court issued its ruling in North Carolina Department of Corrections v. [read post]