Search for: "State v. Chief"
Results 1 - 20
of 21,321
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2023, 10:13 am
State Continue reading The post Timberlake v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:56 am
Van Colle and another v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police; Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex Police [2008] UKHL 50; [2008] WLR (D) 284 “The test for considering whether the state had violated its obligation to protect life under art 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms was stringent and remained constant; no lower standard applied where the threat to an individual's life arose from the… [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 8:53 am
Ron Etermi, University of Connecticut School of Law, is publishing To Defer or Not to Defer: Why Chief Justice Roberts Got it Right in City of Arlington v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:01 am
Chief Constable of Humberside Police and others v Information Commissioner (Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 1079; [2009] WLR (D) 302 “In relation to the national police computer it was for the data controller to determine the purposes for which data was processed. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:40 am
Chief Judge Paul Michel will be retiring from the bench later this month after more than twenty-two years on the bench and five as the chief judge. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 1:52 am
Chief Constable of Humberside Police and Others v Information Commissioner, Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening Court of Appeal “There could be no question of the retention of records of old minor convictions being held in the national police computer to be either excessive or being held for longer than necessary. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 12:43 am
State (No. 123), Womack v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 9:59 pm
United States Patent and Trademark case have moved for Chief Judge Randall R. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 9:01 pm
" He calls on the political branches to find "a long-term solution" to the vacancy problem.Within this discussion of judicial confirmations is a sentence that can plausibly be read as Chief Justice Roberts's response to President Obama's criticism, during his 2010 State of the Union speech, of the Court's decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm
Hear the Chief discuss Judge Wapner v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:05 pm
Chief Justice Castille's concurring opinion in Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 1:02 pm
., asked Chief Justice Roberts to extend the United States’ deadline for filing a cert petition in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 4:36 am
Adam Liptak writes of the possibility that Chief Justice John Roberts might side with the Obama administration in United State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 10:04 am
E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary and Another House of Lords “The positive obligation imposed on the state by article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights to prevent the infliction by third parties of inhuman or degrading treatment was not unqualified and absolute. [read post]
14 May 2018, 9:29 am
Today the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 8:53 am
Wong and United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:44 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:44 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 7:17 am
On August 25, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 5:08 am
This quote comes from a footnote out of the New York's Court of Appeals, our highest court and the one Chief Judge Kaye sits on, in a case last year (Haywood v. [read post]
