Search for: "State v. Christen"
Results 121 - 140
of 159
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2014, 11:17 am
Mayes v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 5:06 pm
With a couple of (similar) dissents that get the votes of Judges Christen, Rawlinson, (Milan) Smith, Hurwitz and Bybee.Notice that you've got judges of all political stripes on both sides. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 10:00 pm
(Compare this to the 2010 case of Christen v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 8:07 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:51 pm
Supreme Court in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 3:25 pm
Detrich v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 2:15 pm
The opinion in Pickup v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 12:43 pm
In Cameron Moon v. the State of Texas, the appeals court vacated the district court’s judgment and dismissed the case after finding insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s findings related to Moon’s maturity, sophistication, and potential rehabilitation. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 8:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 1:00 pm
State officials are absolutely immune for these sorts of executive, prosecutorial decisions. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 8:45 am
In the context of women, if they are denied autonomy, even by actors other than State, the duty of the State does not diminish only on that ground. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 6:14 pm
Smith Jr., Morgan Christen, and Andrew Hurwitz. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 2:27 pm
” United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 4:26 am
At Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr discusses a good ruling out of the 9th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 10:35 pm
In what I will be christening the Maggi rule (!) [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 2:38 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 11:57 am
"Perugini-Christen v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 10:22 am
The one occasion where the disease itself and the state’s approach to it was the focus of the complaint was a Swedish case where the applicant complained that his compulsory isolation in hospital under the state’s infectious diseases legislation deprived him of his liberty contrary to Article 5 (Enhorn v Sweden (2005) 56529/00). [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:53 am
Supreme Court now to uphold Roe v. [read post]
