Search for: "State v. Clair" Results 61 - 80 of 574
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2023, 1:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
Colgate Palmolive Co., filed yesterday by Judge Claire C. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 The government objects to the defendants' efforts to scuttle the case of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:32 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court issued a five-to-three opinion in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:12 pm by Simon Lester
With regard to national security, the document states: The national security exceptions have been moved from Article 37 (New York), where they only applied to Chapter V (New York), to new Article 94, where they apply to the whole Charter. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
While the DeCaro defendants contend that a rescission defense based on unilateral mistake would not have been successful in the underlying action for specific performance, specific performance may be denied based on unilateral mistake [*4]where the other party must have been aware of the mistake (see Da Silva v Musso, 53 NY2d 543, 548; Sheridan Drive-In v State of New York, 16 AD2d 400, 405; Harper, Inc. v City of Newburgh, 159 App Div 695, 696-697). [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
The latest issue of the Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (Vol. 82, no. 2, 2022) is out. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 8:28 am
Scott Panetti's lawyers won a major case, Panetti v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 9:00 pm
Just two months later, Chicagoans hid their faces in shame, as the state legislature impeached and convicted Governor Rod Blagojevich.Four months ago, Chicago defense lawyers hid their faces in grief, as the Fifth District Court of Appeals (downstate of Chicago, by the way) decided De Bouse v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 1:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Supreme Court is therefore satisfied to the standard of acte clair that the EU principle of absolute res judicata does not apply. [read post]