Search for: "State v. Clarkson"
Results 21 - 40
of 76
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
A New York federal judge agreed to certify an interlocutory appeal by SiriusXM against the ruling that gave state copyright law protection to pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:35 pm
Mobil Oil Corp., 862 F.2d 890, 896 (1st Cir. 1988)("posting of a bond is not a jurisdictional prerequisite to the validity of a preliminary injunction"); Clarkson Co, v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:11 am
DiGregorio, 484 N.E.2d 794 (2nd Dist. 1985) and Clarkson v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 9:08 am
Summary The EAT has issued a decision in the well-known and long-running retirement case of Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes, which dealt with the question: Was the retirement age of 65 PROPORTIONATE to achieve the firm’s stated aims of retention of staff and workforce planning? [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:52 pm
American Idol Lawsuit Claims Sony Stiffs Carrie Underwood, Kelly Clarkson 19 Recordings Limited v. [read post]
11 May 2013, 8:25 pm
After Judge Dundy’s decision, Bishop Clarkson, of Nebraska, and James Cook urged Mr. [read post]
11 May 2013, 8:25 pm
After Judge Dundy’s decision, Bishop Clarkson, of Nebraska, and James Cook urged Mr. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 8:27 am
State v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:48 am
On 25 April 2012 the Supreme Court handed down two major judgments on age discrimination: Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2012] UKSC 15 and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes [2012] UKSC 16. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:04 am
Vincent de Paul School, State Judges, State Judges Are Clowns, Steven Davis, Steven H. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:10 am
Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes (Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills and another intervening); [2012] UKSC 16; [2012] WLR (D) 124 “A rule providing for the compulsory retirement at 65 of partners in a firm of solicitors could be justified as a means of achieving legitimate aims relating to recruitment and promotions within the firm. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
This included a Clause 5 (Intrusion into grief or shock) complaint from the Samaritans, Mind, Rethink Mental Illness, Sane and PAPYRUS Prevention of Young Suicide, against the Sun over column by Jeremy Clarkson about rail suicide. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:34 am
The following judgments will be handed down by the Supreme Court on Wednesday 25 April 2012: Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership). [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 9:08 am
” [Clarkson v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:31 am
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm
Mr Clarkson denied the affair but in October 2010 obtained an injunction to restrain the publication of purported private information: AMM v HXW [2010] EWHC 2457. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
The recent Tesla v BBC case ([2012] EWHC 310 (QB)) is a notable exception. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:16 am
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
