Search for: "State v. Coca"
Results 141 - 160
of 542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2014, 4:16 am
In Clark v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 8:57 pm
The Coca-Cola Co., No. 1:00-cv-2838 (N.D. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
[v] The U.N. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 4:49 am
Furthermore, Judge Otero's decision represents another instance in which a court has tied standing under California's UCL to eligibility for restitution, an issue that may well be addressed in another case, Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 8:18 am
Geffner v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 4:34 pm
Enter Ashcroft v. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 2:34 pm
Coca–Cola Co., 472 F.3d 506, 513 (7th Cir. 2006). [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:47 am
Coca-Cola Co. is reported at CCH Advertising Law Guide ¶63,835 and CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law ¶32,051. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:05 am
BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles, No. 13-56126; and Sierra v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 1:40 pm
Descarga el documento: United States v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:12 am
Whether the same can be said for FIFA's major sponsors over the years, which include Nike, Coca-Cola, Visa and McDonalds, Gazprom, Hyandai, Kia and Adidas, remains to be seen. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
This said, a collection of multiple NFTs is actually a collection of multiple, non-fungible, products similar in kind to a physical product produced and sold in a series although within a limited edition.As a sidenote, it is also worth noting that the forthcoming EU Market in Crypto Assets Regulation (MICA) states that “the issuance of crypto-assets as non-fungible tokens in a large series or collection should be considered as an indicator of their fungibility” (Recital 6c, last… [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 7:00 am
Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
20 May 2008, 12:12 pm
McCambridge v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:20 am
This was the subject of an interim decision of Roth J. earlier this month in the Competition Appeal Tribunal: Secretary of State for Health and Others v Servier Laboratories Limited and Others [2017] EWHC 2006 (Ch) -- IPKat's Eibhlin Vardy has made a detailed summary for you.And the weekly routine, Around the IP blogs! [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:56 am
Coca-Cola resists this canon and its high standard. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 12:40 am
The functionality of hashtags was introduced by Twitter but has since been extended to other social media platforms, Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest (to name a few), and the to blogosphere as a whole.Against this backdrop, it is instructive to consider two recent trade mark applications filed in the United States by the Coca Cola Company for 'soft drinks' in class 32, #cokecanpics TM no. 86480497 and #smilewithacoke TM no. 86480495. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:08 am
Coca-Cola Co.); increasing ongoing debate about whether photo-shopped advertising should be banned or regulated in the United States; and then this morning what I thought was a very interesting comment on a potential lawsuit by the Center for Science in the Public Interest (“CSPI”) against Campbell Soup Company for alleged false marketing claims for its V8 Splash and V8 V-Fusion Refresher drinks (see: here). [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:27 am
Importantly, the Coca-Cola action followed on the heels of another class action, Costanza v. [read post]
