Search for: "State v. Community Distributors, Inc."
Results 121 - 140
of 295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2006, 7:29 pm
Antidote International Films, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:16 pm
In particular, NAGR and Bevis pointed to the Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 1:35 am
Copyright did not extend to news articles per say, but a different transient property right.Justice Putney ultimately concluded that International News Services had unlawfully acquired the Associated Press' property, and restricted the publication of news by them appropriated from the Associated Press for a number of hours after its publication, unless proper credit was given.The current state of 'hot news' and its protection is uncertain, with subsequent cases such… [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:09 am
K & N Engineering, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
This post includes a draft of Chapter 7 (Law Beyond Law ― Social Norms, Contract Communities, and Disclosure Regimes). [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 3:00 am
Whole Foods Market Grp., Inc., Case No. 1:14-cv-1135-SS, and Frydman v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
European Community test) to the Lanham Act. [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:09 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:11 am
The case of DirectTV, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 9:07 am
(Cites to Erie, State Farm). [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 10:29 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of the Program. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 10:11 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of the Manny Pacquiao v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 7:02 am
The CCJ noted that this case was similar in circumstances to the previous case of Rudisa Beverages & Juices N.V. and Caribbean International Distributors Inc. v The State of Guyana. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 12:20 pm
Zavodnik v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:45 am
Can’t Live Without It, LLC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
When a Member State's law grants a monopoly of exploitation to the owner of such a right, it follows that the owner may forbid any unauthorized third party, or infringer, from any sale, use or other exploitation within that State.[40] If an industrial or commercial property right has considerable economic significance, the owner in one State usually seeks to obtain parallel protection in all of the other States of the Community; however, this is not… [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 3:37 pm
Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 8:41 am
” (State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
App’x 364, 366–67 (9th Cir. 2018) (considering personal contacts between the appellant and state of Washington to find personal jurisdiction to enforce a foreign arbitral award); S & Davis Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:58 am
EIS, Inc. v. [read post]
