Search for: "State v. Connelly"
Results 81 - 100
of 116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2011, 11:52 am
Connelly, Mem–10–102 (Aug. 12, 2 [read post]
11 Nov 2023, 1:24 am
In Lubbe v Cape, Connelly v RTZ and Vedanta, the English courts accepted jurisdiction, acknowledging that the absence of a means of funding or experienced lawyers to handle the case in a host state will lead to a real risk of the non-availability of substantial justice. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 2:13 pm
Davis v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 8:40 pm
Kagan did work at Williams and Connelly for two years (1989-1991) after her clerkship with Justice Marshall. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm
Connelly v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:20 am
The district court got it wrong here (Connelly v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
Again, as the court ruled in Hazelton v Connelly,13 all that is required for a resignation to become operative is its delivery to the appointing authority prior to the appointing authority's receipt of an employee’s request to withdraw or rescind the resignation. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
Again, as the court ruled in Hazelton v Connelly,13 all that is required for a resignation to become operative is its delivery to the appointing authority prior to the appointing authority's receipt of an employee’s request to withdraw or rescind the resignation. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:04 am
Susan V. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Again, as the court ruled in Hazelton v Connelly,[13] all that is required for a resignation to become operative is its delivery to the appointing authority prior to the appointing authority's receipt of an employee’s request to withdraw or rescind the resignation. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Again, as the court ruled in Hazelton v Connelly,[13] all that is required for a resignation to become operative is its delivery to the appointing authority prior to the appointing authority's receipt of an employee’s request to withdraw or rescind the resignation. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Again, as the court ruled in Hazelton v Connelly,[13] all that is required for a resignation to become operative is its delivery to the appointing authority prior to the appointing authority's receipt of an employee’s request to withdraw or rescind the resignation. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Again, as the court ruled in Hazelton v Connelly,[13] all that is required for a resignation to become operative is its delivery to the appointing authority prior to the appointing authority's receipt of an employee’s request to withdraw or rescind the resignation. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
., v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
., v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm
It is arguable that Article 10 places the state under a positive obligation to provide such access. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:36 am
PR (Sri Lanka) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev 2) [2011] EWCA Civ 988 (11 August 2011): Court of Appeal considers application of “some other compelling reason” test for 3rd bite of cherry immigration appeals Connelly, Re Judicial Review [2011] NIQB 62 (5 August 2011): Northern Ireland High Court rejects UK court’s decision in Hookway (96 hour detention on bail case), says court “failed to recognise the context… [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:45 am
Taiwanese Deputy Foreign Minister Bruce Linghu announced a media tour of Taiping (Itu Aba), which took place on Wednesday, as part of a larger diplomatic blitz in advance of the upcoming merits decision in the Philippines v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:43 am
Connelly v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 6:00 am
Kealoha v. [read post]
