Search for: "State v. Constable"
Results 41 - 60
of 513
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
R (T) v (1) Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, (2) Secretary of State for the Home Department (Secretary of State for Justice an interested party) [2012] EWHC 147 (Admin) – read judgment. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm
The first was a straightforward Jameel v Dow Jones & Co. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
Shep Melnick, is "The Administrative State in Action: Lessons from Title IX. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:06 am
Unfortunately for the Police Service of Northern Ireland (‘PSNI’), the Supreme Court found in DB v Chief Constable of PSNI [2017] UKSC 7 that the Force had made both the law and its life, in policing parades in Belfast, more complicated than it needed to be. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 2:35 am
Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 15 May 2012. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:57 am
However, distinguishing the present case from the leading case of Osman v UK (1998) 29 EHRR 245, Lord Justice Longmore held that the claim for a breach of the ECHR, art 2 should go to trial. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 4:56 am
Ruddy v Chief Constable, Strathclyde Police & Anor [2012] UKSC 57 – read judgment The Supreme Court has ruled that an individual who claimed to have been assaulted by police officers was entitled to bring an action in the sheriff court (Scotland) seeking damages at common law and under the Human Rights Act 1998 against the relevant chief constable arising from the officer’s actions. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 4:26 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:31 am
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions,heard 29-30 April. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 10:07 am
United States and Mapp v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 10:19 am
High Court (Administrative Court) Watkins-Singh, R (on the application of) v The Governing Body of Aberdare Girls’ High School & Anor [2008] EWHC 1865 (Admin) (29 July 2008) Pinnington, R (on the application of) v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police [2008] EWHC 1870 (Admin) (31 July 2008) AV & AU v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWHC 1895 (Admin) (31 July 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Prudential Plc… [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 3:04 am
Desmond v The Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire Police 2011] EWCA Civ 3 (12 January 2011)- Read judgment The Court of Appeal has ruled that it is not possible to sue the police in negligence for not filling in an Enhanced Criminal Record Certificate (ECRC). [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:50 am
The Supreme Court’s decision last week in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:31 am
X (South Yorkshire) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Chief Constable of Yorkshire [2012] EWHC 2954 (Admin)- read judgment The High Court has made an important ruling about the disclosure of information under the Child Sex Offender Disclosure Scheme (CSOD). [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
Lord Kerr is critical of affording the state a margin of appreciation where it has not properly evaluated the issues at stake. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 8:05 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:28 am
R (on the application of J) v the Chief Constable of Devon and Cornwall [2012] EWHC 2996, 26 October 2012 – read judgment Close on the heels of last week’s decision regarding disclosure of information from the Child Sex Offenders Register comes this ruling on the police decision to disclose certain information from a nurse’s enhanced criminal records certificates without affording her an opportunity to make representations before the information… [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 4:30 pm
In Sir Cliff Richard OBE v the BBC and Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police ([2017] EWHC 1648 (Ch)), Mr Justice Mann reviewed the law on statements in open court, and the grounds upon which the court might refuse to permit them. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 1:21 am
The majority, however, buries Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [1989] AC 53 – whose public policy justifications have been inverted. [read post]
