Search for: "State v. Constable" Results 61 - 80 of 513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2015, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
He also stated that the general rule that there is no duty to protect others from third party harm is not appropriate for members of a force whose duty it is to provide protection. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
The first, Henderson v Chief Constable of Fife Police (only available on Westlaw), she argued was related to the issue of liberty and the limits of police authority, not privacy. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:29 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Giving the majority judgment Lord Clarke stated that S & Marper was concerned only with the position of suspected but non-convicted persons, not convicted persons. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 4:04 am
Bedfordshire Police Authority (BPA) v Constable (sued on his own behalf and on behalf of all other members of Syndicate 386 at Lloyd's) (the Syndicate) [2009] EWCA Civ 64 concerned an appeal by the Syndicate against a declaration that the Syndicate was liable to indemnify the BPA. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:55 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Via Ashkan Soltani: ”The Yale Law Journal Online (YLJO) just published an article that Ashkan Soltani co-authored with Kevin Bankston (first workshopped at the Privacy Law Scholars Conference last year) entitled Tiny Constables and the Cost of Surveillance: Making Cents Out of United States v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:48 am by Aileen McColgan, Matrix.
On 25 April 2012 the Supreme Court handed down two major judgments on age discrimination: Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2012] UKSC 15 and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes [2012] UKSC 16. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 6:52 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
As part of the appellant’s application to work as a teacher, the Secretary of State for the Home Department (‘SSHD’) issued an ECRC. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:14 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MH, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 1112 (14 October 2010) Nouri v Marvi & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1107 (14 October 2010) Norbrook Laboratories Ltd & Anor v Carr & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 1108 (14 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Inglis v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 2269 (14 October 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Howden, R (on the application… [read post]
16 May 2010, 9:00 pm by Adam Wagner
Moulton v Chief Constable of the West Midlands [2010] EWCA Civ 524 (13 May 2010) – Read judgment The Court of Appeal has rejected an appeal by a man acquitted of rape as well as his argument that the law of malicious prosecution should be changed in order to bring it into line with Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the right to liberty. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 6:18 am by Isabel McArdle
(1)A Chief Constable, (2) AA v (1)YK, (2)RB, (3)ZS, (4)SI, (5)AK, (6)MH, [2010] EWHC 2438 (Fam) – Read judgment The High Court has given guidance on the role which special advocates may play in forced marriage and honour violence cases. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:52 am by 1 Crown Office Row
A v (1) East Sussex County Council (2) Chief Constable of Sussex (2010) – Read judgment The Administrative Court has held that the removal of a baby from her mother due to fears that she was fabricating symptoms was not a breach of human rights. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Adam Wagner
A (A Child) v The Chief Constable of Dorset Police [2010] EWHC 1748 (Admin) (16 July 2010) – Read judgment The High Court has ruled that the gist of sensitive evidence in a case involving a child being picked up for being spotted with an “inappropriate adult” must be disclosed in order that the child can bring a claim against the police. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 6:18 pm
SUSAN COMBS, SUCCESSOR TO CAROLE KEETON STRAYHORN, COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, AND GREG ABBOTT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TEXAS; from Travis County; 3rd district (03-07-00006-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03-12-08)08-0327 WOODROW WILSON WILLIAMS v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 2:51 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) RO, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2910 (22 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Rahmatullah v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1540 (14 December 2011) Spaceright Europe Ltd v Baillavoine & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1565 (14 December 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Norman v Cheshire Fire & Rescue Service [2011] EWHC 3305 (QB) (14 December… [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:19 pm by Rosalind English
What amounts to “positive action” will no doubt depend upon the circumstances of a particular case and, in some circumstances, the state may be required to take positive steps to prevent ill-treatment at the hands of others (see, e.g., R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 38 at [24] per Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2008] UKHL 66 at [44] per Lord… [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:08 am by traceydennis
Supreme Court Duncombe & Ors v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2011] UKSC 14 (29 March 2011) Jones v Kaney [2011] UKSC 13 (29 March 2011) Lumba (WL) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 12 (23 March 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Folgate London Market Ltd v Chaucer Insurance Plc [2011] EWCA Civ 328 (31 March 2011) W (Children) [2011] EWCA Civ 345 (30 March 2011) Societe Generale, London… [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 6:30 am by Mitra Sharafi
This collection shows how important it is, despite the constant temptation to compression, not to lose sight of the contexts and nuances which qualify and illuminate so many leading authorities.TOC after the jump. 1 R v Pease (1832) MARK WILDE AND CHARLOTTE SMITH2 Burón v Denman (1848) CHARLES MITCHELL AND LESLIE TURANO3 George v Skivington (1869) DAVID IBBETSON4 Daniel v Metropolitan Railway Company (1871) MICHAEL LOBBAN5 Woodley v Metropolitan… [read post]