Search for: "State v. Constable"
Results 101 - 120
of 513
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2018, 7:06 am
The judgment of Calveley v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police [1989] 1 AC 1228 was found to be instructive in this regard, where it was held that a Chief Constable did not, in principle, owe a duty of care to protect the economic and reputational interests of his officers in respect of the prosecution of an investigation or disciplinary proceedings brought against them. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 3:45 am
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill, heard 19th July 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 McCue (as guardian for Andrew McCue) (AP) v Glasgow City Council, heard 18th October 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another,… [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:34 am
The following judgments will be handed down by the Supreme Court on Wednesday 25 April 2012: Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership). [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 11:22 am
United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 1:27 pm
In today’s case (Provost v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:52 pm
As Bill noted Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court in Riley v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 5:50 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Woolley & Anor v Ultimate Products Ltd & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 1038 (26 July 2012) Westcoast (Holdings) Ltd v Wharf Land Subsidiary (No 1) Ltd & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 1003 (26 July 2012) Peaktone Ltd v Joddrell [2012] EWCA Civ 1035 (26 July 2012) NHS Leeds v Larner [2012] EWCA Civ 1034 (25 July 2012) YZ (China), R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 1022… [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 3:22 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Penfold v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1222 (01 June 2012) Gilbert v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1221 (01 June 2012) Saunders v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1185 (01 June 2012) Sandhu v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1187 (01 June 2012) Clark & Anor v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1220 (01 June 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) B (A Child), Re [2012] EWCA Civ 737 (31 May 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Bento v The Chief… [read post]
OH11: Judicial intergrity justifies exclusion; warrantless entry for noise complaint was unjustified
10 Aug 2008, 3:30 pm
State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:02 am
United States decision means. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 8:29 am
By contrast, as the Court of Appeal noted at para 42, in many of the leading cases the treatment in itself caused disadvantage: in Clark v Novacold Ltd [1999] ICR 951 the claimant was dismissed; in Lewisham London Borough Council v Malcolm [2008] UKHL the claim was evicted; and in Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] ICR 337 the claimant chief inspector had part of her duties as a manager removed. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:49 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Aktas v Adepta (A Registered Charity) [2010] EWCA Civ 1170 (22 October 2010) Wilkinson & The Estate of Brian Wilkinson v Farmer [2010] EWCA Civ 1148 (22 October 2010) Law Debenture Trust Corporation Plc v Elektrim SA & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 1142 (22 October 2010) Oakes, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1169 (22 October 2010) Dry, R (on the application of)… [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:30 am
On foot of an ICO, the person was taken into custody and had to be released within 28 days, unless the Chief Constable referred the matter to the Commissioner, who had the power to make a detention order if satisfied that the person was involved in terrorism. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:27 am
Graughran (AP) v The Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland, heard 16 October 2014. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:03 pm
Cortes-Caban, 691 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2012), and United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Capozzo v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:39 pm
” Again, in Dudley Fleming v Chief Constable of Sussex [2004] EWCA Civ 643, Potter LJ observed at paragraph 36: “The principles are too well known to require to be set out in detail. [read post]
27 May 2015, 5:28 am
State, supra (quoting State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:06 am
Lord Tyre stated that this was an act of “reckless folly” which was not excused by Ms Jackson’s age (Ehrari v Curry [2007] EWCA Civ 120 distinguished). [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
” Rusk State Hosp. v. [read post]
