Search for: "State v. Constantine" Results 21 - 40 of 135
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2022, 6:54 am by Dan Lopez
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR PODCAST Episode Transcript and Show Notes: Jeff Shinder: Welcome to Antitrust Matters, a Constantine Cannon podcast, where we have engaging and timely conversations about competition policy in the digital age. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 6:35 pm
*Poppy Alexander and Chris McLamb are attorneys in the whistleblower practice of Constantine Cannon LLP. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 6:35 pm by llaird
*Poppy Alexander and Chris McLamb are attorneys in the whistleblower practice of Constantine Cannon LLP. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On 16 February 2021 Tipples J handed down judgment in the libel and data protection case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 269 (QB). [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:31 am by Rui Dias
It was also discussed in the judgments C-507/17, Google v CNIL; and Case C-136/17 that a data subject should have a “right to be forgotten” where the retention of such data infringes the Directive 95/46 and the GDPR. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:07 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
” 3) Copyright vs data protection: CJEU grappling with the right to information about infringers by Giulia Priora “On 9 July 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in Case C-264/19 Constantin Film Verleih v YouTube and Google Inc. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:28 am by Kluwer Patent Blog
” 3) Copyright vs data protection: CJEU grappling with the right to information about infringers by Giulia Priora “On 9 July 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in Case C-264/19 Constantin Film Verleih v YouTube and Google Inc. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
On 13 October 2020 there was a statement in open court in the case of Warnes v Forge before Warby J. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 3:05 am by Eleonora Rosati
 In addition, like the AG had done in his Opinion in Constantin Film [here and here], the Opinion expressly rejects what it calls a ‘dynamic’ interpretation of the law (in respect of intermediaries’ stay down obligations: see [194]).Let’s now move on to the core of the AG’s construction of liability under Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]