Search for: "State v. Conyers"
Results 101 - 114
of 114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2008, 8:47 am
OR STATE GOVERNMENT WORKS [read post]
22 May 2008, 8:01 pm
” U.S. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 10:19 am
Matthews, Wilson & Matthews, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 5:48 am
It was also a victory for the United States Constitution. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 7:21 am
Phone: (404) 881-0292 Fax: (404) 881-6997 E-mail: gaaarp@aarp.org Web: http://www.aarp.orgga ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Southeast Disability and Business Technical Assistance Center Center for Assistive Technology and Environmental Access Georgia Tech, 490 10th Street Atlanta, GA 30318 Phone: (404) 385-0636; (800) 949-4232 (V/TTY/Toll Free) E-mail: sedbtac@catea.org Web: http://www.sedbtac.org Georgia ADA Exchange 4164 Admiral Drive Chamblee, GA 30341… [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 9:42 am
The Supreme Court granted a Writ of Certiorari on March 26, 2007 in the case of Stoneridge Investment Partners LLC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 6:36 am
This week, Representative John Conyers introduced a resolution recognizing the 50th anniversary of the 1957 enforcement of Brown v. the Board of Education in Little Rock, Arkansas. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 5:15 am
John Conyers, the Chairman of the House Committee on the Judiciary, and Barney Frank, the Chairman of the House Committee on Financial Services, filed a motion for leave to file a brief as Amici Curiae after the filing deadline in order to support investors. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 6:05 am
In the brief, the members note that, if the Supreme Court decides against investors in this case, third parties will effectively be immune from suit no matter how reprehensible their conduct.In the case of Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:06 am
We urge you to take the concerns of the manufacturing sectors of these issues into account in developing the final version of the Patent Reform Act of 2007, H.R. 1908.Read the AFL/CIO letter here (link)See The Politico article, titled "Tech v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 10:33 pm
Saxbe Designated Professor of Law, Moritz College of Law, The Ohio State University Tom Cochran, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Middle District of North Carolina (Attorney for [sic] Vincent Rita, Rita v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 5:32 pm
See U.S. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
Supp. 51 (D.D.C. 1973) (holding that the $10,000 jurisdictional amount in controversy requirement then in the statute (it's since been eliminated) was not satisfied); United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 4:00 am
In Winford v. [read post]
