Search for: "State v. Cook"
Results 261 - 280
of 3,795
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2022, 8:00 am
Jamie Lichter v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 5:50 pm
Cook v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Matter of Cook v Nassau County Police Dept., 140 AD3d 1059, the Appellate Division noted that the State Legislature, "[in] order to create a clear deterrent to unreasonable delays and denials of access [and thereby] encourage every unit of government to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of FOIL", provided for the assessment of an attorney's fee and other litigation costs in FOIL proceedings. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Matter of Cook v Nassau County Police Dept., 140 AD3d 1059, the Appellate Division noted that the State Legislature, "[in] order to create a clear deterrent to unreasonable delays and denials of access [and thereby] encourage every unit of government to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of FOIL", provided for the assessment of an attorney's fee and other litigation costs in FOIL proceedings. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Matter of Cook v Nassau County Police Dept., 140 AD3d 1059, the Appellate Division noted that the State Legislature, "[in] order to create a clear deterrent to unreasonable delays and denials of access [and thereby] encourage every unit of government to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of FOIL", provided for the assessment of an attorney's fee and other litigation costs in FOIL proceedings. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Matter of Cook v Nassau County Police Dept., 140 AD3d 1059, the Appellate Division noted that the State Legislature, "[in] order to create a clear deterrent to unreasonable delays and denials of access [and thereby] encourage every unit of government to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of FOIL", provided for the assessment of an attorney's fee and other litigation costs in FOIL proceedings. [read post]
3 May 2022, 8:00 am
Smart Study Co. v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 6:15 am
In that context, the baseline problem is strongly associated with Cass Sunstein, and especially with his analysis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Lochner v. [read post]
30 Apr 2022, 2:11 pm
The Act includes a preemption provision, providing that “a State, political subdivision of a State, or political authority of at least 2 States may not enact or enforce a law, regulation, or other provision having the force and effect of law related to a price, route, or service of an air carrier. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 7:28 pm
Zmick Seyfarth Synopsis: In Sosa v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 4:49 am
Bar Assoc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
Mark Mason v. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 9:45 am
” Dunn v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 8:05 am
HiQ v. [read post]
17 Apr 2022, 3:58 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm
Treatment could be cooking, high hydrostatic pressure, irradiation, or other validated processes. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 6:09 am
” Mistler v. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 9:37 am
Dent & Cook, P.A., 635 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 4:08 pm
Well, first, don’t eat British Columbia, Canada oysters for a bit. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 5:24 pm
” Rokeby-Johnson v. [read post]
