Search for: "State v. Coty"
Results 41 - 60
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
Coty, 264 U.S. 359 (1924). [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 6:23 am
Coty, 264 U.S. 359 (1924). [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
Never Too Late 69 [week ending on Sunday 25 October] – The 10 Commandments of IP Dispute Resolution | Republic of Cyprus v OHIM on halloumi | Case C-20/14 BGW Marketing- & Management-Service GmbH v Bodo Scholz | Passing off at common law and statutory passing off | Coty v Stadtsparkasse, back to Germany | EU Trade Secrets Draft Directive | “GREASECUTTER” and General Court | IP in the Fashion… [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:24 am
Case C 379/14 TOP Logistics BV, Van Caem International BV v Bacardi & Company Ltd, Bacardi International Ltd; Bacardi & Company Ltd, Bacardi International Ltd v TOP Logistics BV, Van Caem International BV might have been one such case in the eyes of its parties and participants, though this Kat isn't so sure. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:34 am
Multilateralism v Bilateralism: What’s in it for international IP regulation? [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:54 am
(United States) Coty is a global cosmetic company. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am
The CJEU answered the question in the affirmative but the court seized will only have jurisdiction to decide on the damage caused in the territory of the Member State to which it belongs. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:37 am
Coty, 264 U.S. 359, 368 (1924). [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 3:41 pm
On July 27, Germany's Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof - BGH) referred a new copyright case to the Court of Justice of the European Union: I ZR 228/15 - Reformistischer Aufbruch – see the report brought by IPKat Eleonora Rosati.AG Wahl says that, at certain conditions, suppliers of luxury goods may prohibit retailers from selling on third-party online platformsIPKat Eleonora Rosati, timely as always, summarises the recent opinion of Advocate General in Coty… [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am
Title: Smith v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Duh. - ECJ ruling in Coty Prestige Lancaster Group GmbH v Simex Trading AG (IPKat) (Managing IP) Frisdranken/Red Bull dispute is referred to ECJ: Frisdranken Industrie Winters v Red Bull GmbH (Class 46) A serious reference or is somebody winding us up? [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
Most people would agree that the Supreme Court is one of the most important government institutions of the United States, due to its power of judicial review rooted in the famous Marbury v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
No’ had been broadcast in Member States that affords special protection to film titles: Danjaq v OHIM, Mission Products (Class 46) Jesper Kongstad, Benoît Battistelli enter the fray in battle to be next EPO President (IAM) EPO sets deadline for presidential applications (Managing Intellectual Property) (IAM) The IP ecosystem (Innovationpartners) More work on draft council regulation on the EU community patent (BLOG@IP::JUR) Mr Bruno van Pottelsberghe calling for… [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 8:51 am
Opinions A school cannot moot a student's lawsuit merely by announcing a policy change COTI MATTHEWS, ON BEHALF OF HER MINOR CHILD M.M., ET AL. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 4:49 pm
Coty, 264 U.S. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 12:50 pm
However, a Maryland federal district court in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
(Class 46) Member States simplify international design registration system (WIPO) (Class 99) Greece Court of Appeal of Thessaloniki: Trying to claim damages in Greece: RP ABEE ALL DAY vs ALL DAY (Class 46) India Indian ‘Bayh Dole’ Bill keeps stirring a hornet’s nest (Spicy IP) India’s Bayh Dole: A blind legal transplant? [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:08 pm
Ba ba ba, bye BabybelFromageries Bel v J Sainsbury Plc [2019] EWHC 3454 (December 2019)Fact of the day: I don’t like cheese (you could say I’m not fondue it). [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
