Search for: "State v. Coultas"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2009, 8:32 am
AstraZeneca Not Liable For Marketing of Nexium This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 10:06 am
The decision is Gamboa v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 7:29 am
"The decision is Ciszewski v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:09 am
The decision is City of Memphis v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 8:32 am
However, the court stated that if the investor could fashion the claim to circumvent SLUSA preemption, a claim for restitution of the fees paid the company could be recovered as restitution.The March 8 decision is Smit v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:39 pm
The decision is Martin v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 1:21 pm
T-Mobile Awarded Injunction, Damages for Competitor's Violation of Unfair Competition Law This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 7:01 am
The decision is Curtis v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 9:51 am
The decision is Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 7:57 am
The decision in Fink v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:52 am
Whirlpool Corp. appears at CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law ¶32,254.Further details regarding CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law appear here. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 1:11 pm
Schering-Plough Corp., CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law ¶32,301. [read post]
31 May 2010, 6:16 pm
The complaint lacked any explanation of the role that the payor played as a purchaser of Nexium.The decision is Pennsylvania Employee Benefit Trust Fund v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 1:49 pm
The decision is Degelmann v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 5:13 am
Marketing for "Phased Out" Cell Phone Could Violate California Unfair Competition LawThis posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law.Wireless telephone subscribers stated California Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) claims against AT&T, based on the company's marketing and sale of a premium cell phone that it was allegedly in the process of phasing out, according to a… [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 7:22 pm
The fact that the agencies “always” pocketed this difference could be material to a patron searching for the lowest possible rates for a hotel.The decision in Chiste v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm
Consumers could always compare the ticket price to prices listed on the Yankees' website.The decision is Weinstein v. eBay, Inc., CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law ¶32,295.Further information about CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law appears here. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 7:59 am
Gruma Corp. appears at CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law ¶ 32,234.Further information regarding CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law appears here. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 9:52 pm
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 9:03 pm
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Contributor to Wolters Kluwer Antitrust Law Daily.A gun dealer failed to state Sherman Act, Section 1 or Lanham Act commercial disparagement claims against the Village of Norridge, Illinois, stemming from a change in an ordinance that may force the gun dealer to close up shop, according to the federal district court in Chicago (Kole v. [read post]
