Search for: "State v. Covington" Results 221 - 240 of 359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Since the entry into force of the GDPR, cross-border investigations and enforcement actions have been in the hands of SAs in each EU member state. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 5:51 pm by assoulineberlowe
Docket No. 0:19-cv-62173-RS Before NEWSOM and MARCUS, Circuit Judges, and COVINGTON,* District Judge.Opinion of the Court COVINGTON, District Judge: *1 In 2016, commercial photographer Victor Elias discovered infringing uses of his copyrighted images on the internet. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 6:45 am
Bankruptcy Court - Covington 08a0199n.062008/04/16 Burnett v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:03 pm
No tying arrangement existed because the defendants did not require dealers to include gap insurance products in the credit transactions the defendants purchased, or even to buy gap insurance products at all.The decision is Midwest Agency Services, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:02 am
  The court declines to lower the pleading standards for this case.Id. at at 6 (citation and footnote omitted).A few hours later, we received another missive (and not for the first time) from Mike Imbroscio at Covington enclosing Davis v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am by INFORRM
Sullivan Ohio State Law Journal, Forthcoming, Roger Williams Univ. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:04 am
Ed Walters jokes that his practice at Covington & Burling focused on beer and softball. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:27 am by Karen Hudson
Grace argued that summary judgment was inappropriate in light of another FLSA suit against Family Dollar, Morgan v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:21 am
Wilner served as counsel of record to Guantanamo detainees in Rasul v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
Covington, in which the court vacated a district-court remedial order that had required special state elections, signaling, in his view, “that enough Justices on the Court see no urgent need for a special election in 2017,” and making it “exceedingly unlikely there could be a special election in November 2017. [read post]