Search for: "State v. Cross #2"
Results 1 - 20
of 7,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2009, 2:12 am
R (Al-Sweady and others) v Secretary of State for Defence (No 2) [2009] EWHC 2387 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 292 “In any judicial review proceedings relating to a case which involved crucial, ‘hard-edged’ questions of fact in light of which it was necessary for the court to allow cross-examination of makers of witness statements on those [...] [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 9:12 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] 6-2 Tuesday in Environmental Protection Agency v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:52 am
Regina (Al-Sweady and Others) v Secretary of State for Defence (No 2) Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “Full disclosure was required in any judicial review proceedings involving disputed questions of fact so that effective and proper cross-examination of the makers of witness statements on those questions could take place. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 1:47 pm
STATE OF MONTANA, Defendant, Appellant, and Cross-Appellee. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 8:54 am
In State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 7:49 am
Citing language from the obstruction of justice provision, USSG § 2J1.2, dicta in its prior decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:08 am
Latimer argues that the trial court erred when it (1) failed to conduct the proper evidentiary analysis and failed to explain its decision; (2) refused to allow Latimer to obtain a statement relevant to the proceedings; and (3) refused to [...] [read post]
27 May 2010, 11:48 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:27 am
American Humanist Assn., the United States Supreme Court ruled in a 7-2 vote that a 40-foot-tall cross, which has stood along a public highway in the suburbs outside Washington, D.C., will remain standing. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:27 am
American Humanist Assn., the United States Supreme Court ruled in a 7-2 vote that a 40-foot-tall cross, which has stood along a public highway in the suburbs outside Washington, D.C., will remain standing. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:27 am
American Humanist Assn., the United States Supreme Court ruled in a 7-2 vote that a 40-foot-tall cross, which has stood along a public highway in the suburbs outside Washington, D.C., will remain standing. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:27 am
American Humanist Assn., the United States Supreme Court ruled in a 7-2 vote that a 40-foot-tall cross, which has stood along a public highway in the suburbs outside Washington, D.C., will remain standing. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:58 am
Criminal procedure — Confrontation clause — Questions related to state witness’ credibility We are asked to determine whether the trial court erred when it: (1) granted the State’s request to advise a defense witness of his Fifth Amendment rights; (2) and limited appellant Marcus Black’s cross-examination of a State’s witness. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 2:39 am
Andrusiek v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 11:11 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 10:59 am
On June 23, 2015, in State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:18 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
Approximately two months ago, in People v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:23 am
STATE OF MONTANA, Defendant, Appellant, and Cross-Appellee. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:15 am
In American Atheists, Inc. v. [read post]
