Search for: "State v. Cuevas"
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2024, 10:14 am
Desserts, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 7:55 am
The plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:50 am
Held v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
Nev. 2012) (citing United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:06 pm
” As applied to older technologies, the rule contemplates that a tracking device may be a mechanical tool used to track the movement of a tangible object., like the beeper attached to a container of chloroform in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 6:04 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
(Hint: The answer ain’t stacked misdemeanors).United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:06 pm
Grant v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Recently, in Cuevas v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:32 pm
The state had previously filed a compliant brief that covered many of the same points, but we ordered replacement briefs in light of Daire v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 8:55 pm
The divided Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 5:51 pm
Cuevas-Segarra, concentrating in civil litigation. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 4:23 pm
No facts make short opinions.United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:18 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 9:38 am
Krull , 480 U.S. 340 (1987) (police conducted a search in reasonable reliance on subsequently invalidated state statutes); Arizona v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm
Jones, Hughes v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 11:58 am
Notably, just last week, in Alamo v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:17 am
See Cuevas v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 5:41 pm
Jones, Hughes v. [read post]
