Search for: "State v. Cummins" Results 41 - 60 of 160
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
He is also the writer of the Tort Talk Blog and provides mediation services through Cummins Mediation.Dog BiteIn the case of Roegner v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 12:59 pm by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Supreme Court Upending Established Case LawBy Max Mitchell | Pennsylvania Law Weekly December 23, 2019Pennsylvania State Capitol. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
”If it’s ultimately determined that Ryman and the Ents legitimately waived stacking, Norton said, the case would be more similar to the state Supreme Court’s 2006 ruling in Craley v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:51 pm by Samantha Maddern
In summary The above decisions demonstrate the ease with which adverse action claims may be brought, the importance of having credible evidence to support the reason for dismissal, and the high potential costs for an employer who does take unlawful adverse action. [1] Employees of employers who are not in the federal workplace relations system, such as small unincorporated businesses or partnerships, cannot bring adverse action claims. [2] Section 341 Fair Work Act 2009. [3] Keenan v… [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
‘Tincher’ Altered the Law (Somewhat)Back in 2014, when the Pennsylvania Supreme Court released its much-anticipated products liability decision in the case of Tincher v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 2:00 am by NCC Staff
The issue made it to the Supreme Court, where Chief Justice Edward White wrote in Wilson v. [read post]