Search for: "State v. Cummins" Results 61 - 80 of 160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2007, 7:56 am
In the case of Cummins v Superior Court, (2005) 36 Cal 4th 478, the California Supreme Court held that the "Lemon Law" only applies to vehicles that are bought in the state of California. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 9:46 am
Charles & Dorothy Cummins Family Limited Partnership (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 1630, which reached the opposite conclusion. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Cummins is a partner and civil litigator with the Scranton, Pa., law firm of Foley Comerford & Cummins. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 5:10 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Cummins is a partner and civil litigator with the Scranton law firm of Foley, Cognetti, Comerford, Cimini & Cummins. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 8:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Cummins is a partner and civil litigator with the Scranton law firm of Foley Comerford &Cummins. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:42 am
I’m sorry to say that the Texas Court of Appeals just joined this small minority, in the April 9 Cummins v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Cummins is a partner and civil litigator with the Scranton, Pa., law firm of Foley Comerford & Cummins. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Cummins is a partner and civil litigator with the Scranton, Pa., law firm of Foley Comerford & Cummins. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 8:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Stated otherwise, an expert's opinion that amounts to a mere guess or conjecture is not admissible in evidence, as in Laubach v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 8:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Stated otherwise, an expert's opinion that amounts to a mere guess or conjecture is not admissible in evidence, as in Laubach v. [read post]