Search for: "State v. Curiale"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2015, 9:59 am
Ltd v Daewoo Logistics [2015] EWHC 194 (Comm). [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 3:03 pm
The case, Freddy Curial v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 6:01 pm
"4(v)(i) (i) While proper law for arbitration agreement (Curial Law) is indisputably Singaporean Law, what is the proper law for the contract qua the said contract dated 10.9.2003? [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:59 am
Although the Supreme Court has not directly addressed the issue in depth, it has stated:"The specification of “place of arbitration” may have special significance in an International Commercial Arbitration, where the “place of arbitration” may determine which curial law would apply. [read post]
26 May 2011, 5:14 pm
With the scope being limited to the premises stated above, decisions of the SC in the matter of Bhatia International , Citation Infowares, Dozco v Doosan; Videocon v Union of India and Gujarat HC’s decision in Hardy Oil are analysed below. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:25 am
Article V.1 provides: “1. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 8:58 pm
While the concurring reasons in Vavilov stated at para 286 that “Curial deference is the hallmark of reasonableness review,” the majority stated at para 24 that legislatures cannot shield administrative decision-making entirely from curial scrutiny, as judicial review is protect under s. 96 of the Constitution Act, 1867. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 10:55 pm
Section 51 of the 1996 Act states:"Saving. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 12:31 am
In C v D [2007] EWCA Civ 1282, D insured C under a Bermuda Form policy that provided for London arbitration and was governed by New York Law. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:48 am
C v D [2007] EWCA Civ 1282). [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:23 am
However, as stated in Para 37 of the Earlier Judgement, the Singaporean International Arbitration Act was the curial law.The Earlier Judgement (para 36) stated that as per Bhatia International, Part I was applicable even if the seat was in India. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:38 am
State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 6:29 am
(1) Roger Shashoua (2) Rodemadan Holdings Ltd (3) Stancroft Trust Ltd v Mukesh Sharma [2009] EWHC 957 (Comm) involved a dispute over a shareholders agreement governed by Indian law, which contained an arbitration clause providing for an arbitration in London, under the rules of the International Chamber of Commerce (the ICC). [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
” State v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:03 am
The curial law, the SIAC Rules, became applicable once the arbitration commenced and excluded the Applicability of Part I. [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:13 am
Subject to the Front Comor argument which I consider later in this judgment, the Court of Appeal’s decision in C v D is to be taken as correctly stating the law. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
The majority (for the benefit of non-UK readers, when there is a majority the law is to be understood to be stated on this matter by that majority in a manner as authoritative as if there had been unanimity across all five judges) considered that there was no choice of an applicable law pertinent to Art.3 of Rome I in the underlying contract by which Enka’s services had been engaged. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:00 am
Originally published in Italian (2007), the book has been translated to English by Thomas V. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 6:40 pm
Court of Appeal stated in R. v. [read post]
