Search for: "State v. Currie" Results 241 - 260 of 457
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Finding no constitutional violations that would vitiate Nichols's conviction, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. 08a0027p.06 Curry v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
Despite “the difficulty & awkwardness of operating by force on the collective will of a State,” armed federal intervention in state affairs must be permitted.[4]During the Convention, on three different occasions, Madison tried to grant the federal government this absolute “negative” (what we now call a veto) over all state legislation. [read post]
8 May 2017, 10:17 am
I “Curry favour with Donald Trump'” by granting trade mark rights… seriously? [read post]
29 May 2022, 12:27 pm by privacylawyer
“Prof Currie suggests that the critical issue is measuring the reasonably reduced expectation of privacy at the border and the extent of permissible state intrusion into it. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 1:05 am by Jarod Bona
Even the greatest innovators can’t overcome that—unless, of course, they curry the right favor with the government. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 7:32 am by Pablo Arredondo
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK  December 21, 2024 Genesis Technology v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
On 20-24 June 2022, there will be a trial in the case of Robert Lee v Vanessa Brown before Collins Rice J On 22 June 2022, there will be an application in Koutrouchi v Currie Appeal before Johnson J On 23-24 June 2022, there will be applications in Piepenbrock v LSE before Heather Williams J. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 12:35 pm by Lorene Park
For example, in Curry v MillerCoors, Inc, a court dismissed the wrongful discharge claim of an employee who was fired for testing positive for marijuana, even though he had a state license to use medical marijuana, had never used it on the employer’s premises, and was not under the influence at work. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 3:59 pm
To illustrate, recall the 2005 case of Eddy Curry: in that instance the Chicago Bulls refused to extend the contract of Curry unless he took a genetic test. [24] The Chicago Bulls were concerned that Curry might have a rare mutation that increased the chance of him suffering a fatal heart attack while playing for the team. [25] Ultimately, Curry signed with the New York Knicks without ever having to take a genetic test. [26] GINA is designed to stop situations… [read post]