Search for: "State v. D. A. H."
Results 1 - 20
of 3,808
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2010, 2:11 am
MS (Palestinian Territories) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 25; [2010] WLR (D) 150 “The specifying of a particular country or territory of destination in a notice of a decision to remove an illegal immigrant from the United Kingdom was not an integral part of an immigration decision within the meaning of s 82(2)(h) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 3:28 pm
To begin a state specific search, choose the first letter of the state you would like to search:A C D F G H I K L M N O P R S T U V W Whether you are a government zoning official determining other city zoning regulations, a developer researching available land, or a concerned citizen investigating government issues, GovScan is here to help. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
Posted by D. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
Posted by D. [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:56 am
Pomiechowski v District Court of Legunica, Poland; Lukaszewski v District Court in Torun, Poland; Rozanski v Regional Court 3 Penal Department, Poland; Regina (Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 20; [2012] WLR (D) 158 “When a notice of appeal against an extradition decision had an irregularity which could be cured by amendment and the circumstances merited that, the court had jurisdiction to permit the… [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 8:56 pm
United States William H. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 11:37 am
Save Jobs USA v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:22 am
State v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
Whatever thе rеаѕоn, you аrе now thrеаtеnеd wіth аn Intеrnаl Rеvеnuе Service (IRS) wage gаrnіѕhmеnt or state tax levy. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 2:07 pm
USCIS is updating its interpretation and implementation of 8 CFR 274a.13(d) to provide that certain H-4, E, or L dependent spouses will qualify for the automatic extension provided under this regulatory provision if certain conditions are met. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 6:24 am
Gregory H. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:33 am
Dodge John H. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 9:01 am
” United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 2:52 pm
USCIS acknowledges in the new memorandum that “neither statutes nor regulations state the maximum allowable time of non-productive status. [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:26 am
The Supreme Court today released its decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:23 pm
This discussion at oral argument was a reprise of SG Prelogar’s argument in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:22 am
The D. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:10 am
Should Mary H. be permitted to possess firearms? [read post]
