Search for: "State v. DISTRICT COURT OF FIFTH JUDICIAL DIST."
Results 141 - 160
of 163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2007, 6:58 am
-Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no writ); Jordan v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
Tempe Union High School Dist. (9th Cir. 1998) and Turkish Coalition of Am., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
San Mateo County Community College Dist. (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 596. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 2:22 am
Therefore, the court affirmed the judgment of the district court. [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am
Dist. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
San Mateo County Community College Dist. (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 596. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
San Mateo County Community College Dist. (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 596. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
Dist. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
The district court rejected his arguments, and so do we. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
Judicial hubris that ignores Buckman Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:30 am
As the Supreme Court wrote in Davis v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
In its decision certified for partial publication, the Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 11:51 am
See United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
Civil Action No. 09-1931 (RMU), No. 12., 13 United States District Court, District of Columbia. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:53 pm
The district court rejected his arguments, and so do we. [read post]
