Search for: "State v. DR"
Results 41 - 60
of 7,381
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
In R (on the application of Naik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] EWCA Civ 1546) the Court of Appeal confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 4:21 pm
To discuss the case, we have Dr. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 6:50 pm
Dr. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 4:18 pm
Bayer AG v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:08 am
Co v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 12:56 am
Media law academic Dr David Rolph reflects on two significant cases. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 1:45 pm
In a complaint entitled “Football Conspiracy / Very Weak Schedule,” the JLR (d/b/a “Dr. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:58 pm
It has been widely debated in recent cases (R (Smith) v Secretary for Defence [2010] UKSC 29 (see our post); Al-Skeini & Others v Secretary of State for Defence [2008] 1 AC 153, currently before the Grand Chamber; Bankovic v Belgium [2001] 11 BHRC 435) whether Article 1 ECHR guarantees the rights and freedoms of the Convention to those outside of the State’s jurisdiction. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am
In the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) Nicol J held that a Government Press Release which meant that the claimant, Dr Salman Butt, was an extremist hate speaker constituted a statement of opinion, not of fact. [read post]
28 May 2015, 1:06 pm
Sweitzer, an attorney who was suspended by the Attorney Grievance Commission on September 22, 2014, because of the conviction at issue here, represented Dr. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:34 am
Criminal Trial in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 7:00 am
" to which plaintiffs replied "Yes".Judge Davis then stated he was considering striking all of Dr. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:43 am
In response, the Radils designated an affidavit from Ardith in which she stated she had called Dr. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 8:04 am
Dr. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 9:22 pm
Here’s the latest: Following the Eleventh Circuit decision last month in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 4:33 am
" In Doe v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 1:14 pm
In October 2010, in Xplore Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 7:08 am
This type of testimony has repeatedly been held inadmissible.* United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 4:08 pm
Va. struck several of the counts of which Dr. [read post]
