Search for: "State v. De Lucia" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am by Marty Lederman
  Three weeks after his petition in Hargan, the Solicitor General filed another extraordinary brief in No. 17-130, Lucia v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am by Marty Lederman
  Three weeks after his petition in Hargan, the Solicitor General filed another extraordinary brief in No. 17-130, Lucia v. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 8:39 am
Andrew Craig Blackmore, Rediscovering the origins and inclusion of the public trust doctrine in South African environmental law: A speculative analysis Case NoteMelissa Powers, Juliana v United States: The next frontier in US climate mitigation? [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:02 am
Schwebel, The outlook for the continued vitality, or lack thereof, of investor–State arbitration Francisco González de Cossío, Enforcement of annulled awards: towards a better analytical approach Berk Demirkol, Interpretation of the dispute settlement clause in Turkish investment treaties with Turkic States Kateryna Bondar, Allocation of costs in investor-State and commercial arbitration: towards a harmonized approach Stephanie Mullen… [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Samar, Toward a New Separation of Church and State: Implications for Analogies to the Supreme Court Decision in Hobby Lobby by the Decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At Slate, Mark Joseph Stern suggests that Justice Elena Kagan’s majority opinion in Lucia v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:09 am by Daniel Walters
Although the court’s narrow holding retaining (and restating) Auer deference looks on its face much like the anti-climactic decision in Lucia v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” At LAWnLingistics, Neal Goldfarb notes that Lucia v. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 7:53 am by Elliot Setzer
Circuit’s ruling in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
At Techdirt, Tim Cushing looks at this week’s argument in United States v. [read post]