Search for: "State v. DeCaro"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2010, 3:34 am
While the DeCaro defendants contend that a rescission defense based on unilateral mistake would not have been successful in the underlying action for specific performance, specific performance may be denied based on unilateral mistake [*4]where the other party must have been aware of the mistake (see Da Silva v Musso, 53 NY2d 543, 548; Sheridan Drive-In v State of New York, 16 AD2d 400, 405; Harper, Inc. v City of Newburgh, 159 App Div 695, 696-697). [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:03 am
While the DeCaro defendants contend that a rescission defense based on unilateral mistake would not have been successful in the underlying action for specific performance, specific performance may be denied based on unilateral mistake [*4]where the other party must have been aware of the mistake (see Da Silva v Musso, 53 NY2d 543, 548; Sheridan Drive-In v State of New York, 16 AD2d 400, 405; Harper, Inc. v City of Newburgh, 159 App Div 695, 696-697). [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 10:36 am
Facts of the Case Here are the facts of Cook v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 3:17 pm
Partner, DeCaro & Kaplen LLP, and Chair, New York State Traumatic Brain Injury Coordinating Council > Marie Cavallo. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:21 am
As a Vice President of the New York State Academy of Trial Lawyers, a statewide bar association representing attorneys,members of the judiciary and law professors throughout New York State, it was my honor to represent the Academy and provide testimony to the New York State Senate Insurance Committee earlier this week that was examining issues of No Fault fraud and ways to "reform" New York's No Fault Insurance Laws. [read post]
1 May 2019, 2:54 pm
However, the First Circuit had already rejected a similar argument in DeCaro v. [read post]
