Search for: "State v. DeGidio" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2009, 7:01 am
In Judge Carr's court, if a plaintiff sues both non-diverse health care providers (on medical malpractice claims) and an out-of-state drug company (on product liability claims), the federal court can sever and remand the med mal claims and retain jurisdiction over the then-diverse products claims.That's the result in DeGidio v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 3:56 am
If, on the other hand, the disciplinary hearing is not deemed concluded until the hearing officer issued his or her determination and recommendations, this 60-day period would begin to run not before the date the hearing officer issued his or her report -- November 20, 1998.Another case contract time limits: City of Newburgh v DeGidio, 273 A.D.2d 468. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 6:34 am by Joy Waltemath
The employer was simply looking to use arbitration as an insurance policy in case it was unable to stem the action in litigation—conduct that “could not be more at odds with the FAA’s goal of facilitating the expeditious settlement of disputes,” the appeals court said (Degidio v. [read post]