Search for: "State v. Deir" Results 1 - 20 of 99
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Power to the Public: DEIR’s Failure to Identify Proposed Project Among Handful of Vastly Different Analyzed Alternatives Violates CEQA’s Requirement to Contain “Accurate, Stable and Finite” Project Description, Vitiates Intelligent Public Participation, Holds First District
17 Nov 2017, 2:26 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  (Citing Lavie v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
The Brexit Case, R (Miller & Dos Santos) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union – the Parties’ Written Cases
30 Nov 2016, 6:51 am by Blog Editorial
The most important constitutional law case of modern times, R (Miller & Dos Santos) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, is being heard on 5 to 8 December 2016 by all 11 judges of the Supreme Court. [read post]
UK Supreme Court Blog - http://ukscblog.com/
Objector's Questioning Of Project Sufficient To Meet The Standing Requirement To Bring a CEQA Claim. Separating Out A Portion of the Original Project For Separate Environmental Review Did Not Result In Impermissible Project Splitting.
6 Jan 2015, 4:16 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Abbott Paulek v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
When Recirculating a DEIR: How Much of a Summary of the Changes is Necessary? As With Most CEQA Decisions: It Depends
29 Dec 2021, 3:00 am by William W. Abbott
In Save Civita Because Sudberry Won’t v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Brexit Judgment: R Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin)
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am by Maria Kendrick
By Maria Kendrick The much awaited High Court judgment of 3 November 20161)R Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). was an historical decision which saw the Executive’s use of prerogative powers delineated in the context of Treaty making, and unmaking, in a successful Judicial Review against the Government. [read post]
Kluwer Patent Blog - http://kluwerpatentblog.com
With Friends Like This, Who Needs CEQA Enemies?
3 Sep 2013, 8:58 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Abbott Friends of Oroville v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
CEQA: 2009 Year in Review
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am by Abbott & Kindermann
 A writ will not lie to compel certification of a DEIR. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
WILL CSU EVER GRADUATE FROM CEQA SCHOOL?
9 Sep 2015, 9:37 am by Abbott & Kindermann
City of Marina v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
A “Capitol” Offense: Third District Holds State Capitol Building Annex/Visitor Center Protect EIR Violated CEQA Due To Inadequate Project Description And Analyses Of Historical Cultural Impacts, Aesthetics, And Project Alternatives
2 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm by Arthur F. Coon
v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
CEQA Mixed-Use “Mix and Match” Upheld: Second District Holds Stable Project Description Requirement Does Not Mean Ultimately Approved Version of Revised Mixed Use Project Must Match An Alternative Analyzed In EIR, And New Project Alternative Added to FEIR Does Not Require Recirculation
7 Jul 2022, 11:22 am by Arthur F. Coon
  (Per the Court, those cases are: (1) County of Inyo v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
EIR Fails For Insufficient Response To One Comment Letter
15 Feb 2012, 8:37 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Abbott Flanders v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
State Courts Lack Jurisdiction Over CEQA Challenge To Matters Within FERC’s Jurisdiction In Hydroelectric Dam Relicensure Process For Oroville Dam Facilities
26 Dec 2018, 2:44 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  County of Butte v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
State Lands Commission’s CEQA Review of SF Bay/Delta Sand Mining Project Approval Is Adequate, But Fails to Fulfill Obligation to Consider Public Trust Doctrine
24 Nov 2015, 12:03 pm by Arthur F. Coon
San Francisco Baykeeper, Inc. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
The Other CEQA Shoe Drops: Third District Reverses Judgment Upholding Siskiyou County’s EIR For Crystal Geyser Bottling Plant Project, Holds (1) Project Objectives Were Too Narrowly Stated And (2) County Should Have Recirculated EIR’s Climate Discussion To Allow Comment On Substantially Higher GHG Emissions Estimate First Disclosed In FEIR
27 May 2022, 5:04 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  (Citing North Coast Rivers Alliance v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Third District Holds CEQA Does Not Require Recirculation Based On Staff-Recommended Alternative Raised After Preparation of Final EIR
15 Nov 2013, 11:53 am by Arthur F. Coon
  South County Citizens for Smart Growth v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Second District Confirms Parking Is (Still) Not A CEQA Impact, Reverses Judgment That Found EIR For San Gabriel Mountains Wilderness Recreation And Preservation Project Deficient For Not Sufficiently Analyzing “Impact” Of Reducing Recreational Parking
23 Aug 2021, 8:52 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Save Our Access – San Gabriel Mountains v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fourth District Addresses CEQA Issues Concerning Standing, Mitigation,Baseline, Piecemealing, And Responses To Comments In Affirming Judgment Upholding Perris Dam Remediation Program EIR
4 Nov 2014, 2:33 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a published decision filed October 31, 2014 (Paulek v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
EIR Satisfies CEQA Despite Minor Deficiencies and Inaccuracies Where Environmental Review Process Not Prejudiced, Third District Holds
2 Nov 2012, 2:17 pm by Arthur F. Coon
(Mount Shasta Bioregional Ecology Center v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Live Blog: R (Miller & Anor) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (Day 3)
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of  section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10  Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
UK Supreme Court Blog - http://ukscblog.com/
First District Affirms Judgment Rejecting All CEQA Challenges To Oakland A’s Ballpark Development EIR Except Improper Deferral of Wind Impacts Mitigation
11 Apr 2023, 8:52 am by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Citing Sierra Club v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com