Search for: "State v. Desmond" Results 81 - 100 of 143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15 Nov 2018. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
Meanwhile Longmore LJ stated that: The question in a case of misuse of private information is whether the information is private, not whether it is true or false. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Balancing competing rights Irish defamation cases are increasingly replete with comments stating the need to balance the constitutional right to freedom of expression with the constitutional right to a good name. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:12 am by INFORRM
In the Courts On 2 and 3 July 2012, Tugendhat J heard an application in the case of Desmond v Forbes. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 6:16 am by Chijioke Okorie
While the High Court found Morison liable for trademark infringement as well as passing-off, the trial judge did not make a finding of copyright infringement, stating that as the designer of the device was not called to testify, copyright ownership was not sufficiently proven. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:06 am by Kevin
"Congo became increasingly obsessed" with his art, Desmond Morris said. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
  In addition to the editors and executives, the proprietor of Express Newspapers, Richard Desmond, gave evidence. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 5:01 am by Phil Dixon
This culminated in the famous Terry v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 am by Amy Howe
”  And at Vox.com, Jenee Desmond-Harris weighs in on Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 7:08 am by Thomas Key
This part begins with chapter 14, in which Desmond Manderson discusses Rafael Cauduro's 7 Crimines Mayores. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 2:03 am
Eve Gray (UCT) opened with a neo-colonial background into South Africa’s copyright reform noting the interplay of colonialism in the fair use v fair dealing debate. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Miller v Associated Newspapers heard 21 to 25 May 2012 (Sharp J) AAA v Associated Newspapers heard 17 to 20, 25 and 26 June 2012 (Nicola Davies J) Desmond v Foreman, heard 2 to 3 July 2012 (Tugendhat J) SKA v CRH, heard 10 and 11 July 2012 (Nicola Davies J) [read post]