Search for: "State v. Donald"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,797
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 4:23 pm
Justice Michael Lee stated in his judgment that they were uncontradicted by any evidence in reply from Lehrmann. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm
Six alternate jurors are selected in the Donald Trump hush money trial. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm
Six alternate jurors are selected in the Donald Trump hush money trial. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm
Six alternate jurors are selected in the Donald Trump hush money trial. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:39 am
More than two decades after the shock of Bush v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:31 am
And in 1982, in Nixon v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
” Raskin is a former law professor (and one of the most astute legal minds in Congress) who has been very active in, among other things, the congressional investigation into events of Donald Trump and others on January 6, 2021.Just a few minutes into his prepared remarks, Raskin interrupted by seemingly pro-Palestinian protesters who shouted that Raskin is “complicit in genocide. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
., told his X followers why he thought former President Donald Trump should be reelected. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
He noted that just last week, in Bissonnette v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:46 pm
Last month, we filed an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:17 am
United States, a case that could fundamentally change many cases of January 6th defendants, including the prosecution of former president Donald Trump. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 7:05 pm
I attended oral arguments in the case Snyder v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:50 am
Fischer v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
United States On 11 April 2024, the Colorado Court of Appeals found that Section 230 immunity applied to two retweets from Donald Trump and his son about a Dominion Voting employee that said he was going to make sure Trump would not win the 2020 election, Coomer v Donald J. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 9:16 am
(See DSM-V). [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Lawmakers there are considering a proposal (backed by Republican candidate Donald Trump) to alter the way the state allocates electors based on the November election results in the state. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:00 pm
United States. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:16 am
Nearly a decade ago, in Yates v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTES [1] State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
