Search for: "State v. Donato"
Results 1 - 20
of 61
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2023, 5:33 am
" United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 10:12 am
—Mahatma Gandhi 1Lloyd’s America v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 8:29 pm
The plan is for a long-form settlement agreement to be submitted to Judge James Donato in about a month. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:12 am
Cal.Implications for sanctions motion in United States et al. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 1:34 am
Yesterday (Friday, March 31) the DOJ filed its reply brief in support of its motion for sanctions: United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:29 am
Meanwhile, Google has filed its opposition brief, which just like in the Northern District of California is the epitome of denial:United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 2:40 am
The issue has also widened because the DOJ and the same state AGs as in the litigation that was originally started by Epic brought a motion for sanctions in the United States et al. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 11:16 pm
The motion proposes an evidentiary hearing over this issue.This is only the latest example of United States et al. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 11:33 am
"Remember, remember, the 5th 6th of November" (and the 12th of September):Judge James Donato of the United States District has formally approved a case schedule negotiated between Google and the Google Play Store antitrust plaintiffs (three dozen U.S. states, Epic Games, Match Group, and a consumer class action) and set the In Re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation (case no. 3:22-cv-2746-JD, N.D. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 1:21 am
" Google opposes any trial date earlier than November 6 because of a potential conflict with the trial in the first United States et al. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 12:59 am
By coincidence, that was the day the United States Department of Justice and eight state AGs filed a second Unite States et al. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 4:29 am
Google's counterproposal is October 23, arguing that the plaintiffs' proposal "will likely conflict with the trial in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 9:00 am
In David Swartz, et al., v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 12:12 pm
Judge James Donato of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California had entered the following order on Tuesday (November 15):"The request by plaintiffs Epic and Match to file amended complaints, [...], is granted. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 8:32 pm
But above all, it's a chance for three dozen U.S. states, Epic Games, Match Group, and the consumer class-action plaintiffs to argue that an adverse inference is warranted (or, as a fallback position, a curative instruction).If not for the Epic Games v. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 2:12 am
And in the meantime, there'll be the big Epic Games v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 2:29 am
Match Group has been named as a defendant in litigation relating to its billing and subscription practices filed by multiple California District Attorneys relating to such practices, People of State of California v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:13 am
Google described it as a mere clarification, though I would agree with Epic and others that in reality it constituted a policy change, an about-face.By "[f]or the time being" I meant that this is just temporary, like a moratorium:At the very latest, this agreement terminates when the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has entered final judgment in, or otherwise disposed of, Epic Games v. [read post]
14 May 2022, 1:51 am
Techs., LLC v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 10:00 am
Now, to no one’s surprise, Judge Donato dismissed the Twitter case (Step 4 of my prediction). [read post]
