Search for: "State v. Doran"
Results 1 - 20
of 69
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2009, 3:17 am
Liverpool City Council v Doran (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 146; [2009] WLR (D) 83 “There was no conflict between the propositions (1) that there was no formula setting out the factors which could be relied upon by a licensee in support of an argument that the decision of [...] [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:42 am
Michael Doran has posted “Tribal Sovereignty Preempted,” forthcoming in the Brooklyn Law Review, on SSRN. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 7:14 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0496, 2011 MT 88, TIM FELLOWS, SCOTT CUNNINGHAM, JAMES DAY, BETH DORAN, et al., Petitioners and Appellants, v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 1:25 pm
In U.S. v Doran, Dr. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 1:25 pm
In U.S. v Doran, Dr. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 5:04 pm
Doran v. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 11:59 pm
That decision effectively overruled Worcester v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 11:06 am
Doran set out a number of guidelines for determining if Section 18 is available to a municipal employee being sued in federal or state courts.Justice Doran said that under Public Officers Law §18(3)(a), a municipality is required to provide for an employee's defense in any civil action, state or federal, "arising out of any alleged act or omission which occurred or allegedly occurred while the employee was acting within the scope of his [or her]… [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 4:11 am
Doran set out a number of guidelines for determining if Section 18 is available to a municipal employee being sued in federal or state courts.Justice Doran said that under Public Officers Law §18(3)(a), a municipality is required to provide for an employee's defense in any civil action, state or federal, "arising out of any alleged act or omission which occurred or allegedly occurred while the employee was acting within the scope of his [or… [read post]
26 May 2011, 1:28 pm
From John Doran in GT Phoenix: The U.S. [read post]
14 May 2011, 7:19 am
State of Connecticut Dept. of Educ. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 4:33 pm
Doran v Liverpool City Council [2009] EWCA Civ 146 concerned a possession claim for a plot on a local authority travellers’ site. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:52 pm
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeal pulls back the curtain a bit in Doran v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 6:36 pm
The Appellate Division, Third Department in Champ-Doran v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 6:58 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 5:13 am
Doran v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 5:43 am
As the site also notes, a “warrant is not required because the state, in legally impounding the vehicle, bears legal liability for the contents of the vehicle. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 3:51 am
Mattis, Dalmazzi v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:59 pm
Since then, the Court of Appeal has decided on Doran v Liverpool CC [2009] EWCA Civ 146 (our report) and McGlynn v Welwyn Hatfield BC [2009] EWCA Civ 285 (our report), further shaping the landscape. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 5:13 am
Doran (the Plaintiff’s manager) stated that he had the best view in the house while walking behind plaintiff and another female employee. [read post]
